<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenID has it&#160;right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hans.gerwitz.com/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hans.gerwitz.com/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>The soliloquy of Hans Gerwitz</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hans</title>
		<link>http://hans.gerwitz.com/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I'm aware of Yadis, notice the link in the last paragraph.  What frustrated me as a potential implementor is that you didn't seem to acknowledge any value in decoupling my "home URL" and my "LID URL" until OpenID came along and threatened to usurp LID's role as the "2.0" standard.

Personally, I feel that Yadis is an unnecessary layer and is "too hard" to be widely adopted (as with Liberty or any number of RDF-based semantic web initiatives).

Don't be too offended, though... I challenge because I care.  LID and your Identity 2.0 talks woke the community up; we might be a year or more behind if you hadn't woken everyone up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-3253e4bcb9119fa370ff5951ddbab2150d65fdd7'>I&#8217;m aware of Yadis, notice the link in the last paragraph.  What frustrated me as a potential implementor is that you didn&#8217;t seem to acknowledge any value in decoupling my &#8220;home URL&#8221; and my &#8220;LID URL&#8221; until OpenID came along and threatened to usurp LID&#8217;s role as the &#8220;2.0&#8221; standard.</p>
<p>Personally, I feel that Yadis is an unnecessary layer and is &#8220;too hard&#8221; to be widely adopted (as with Liberty or any number of RDF-based semantic web initiatives).</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be too offended, though&#8230; I challenge because I care.  LID and your Identity 2.0 talks woke the community up; we might be a year or more behind if you hadn&#8217;t woken everyone up.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johannes Ernst</title>
		<link>http://hans.gerwitz.com/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/2006/04/06/openid-has-it-right.html#comment-4</guid>
		<description>You seem to be missing a bit of history over the last year, assuming this is a new post.

For example, Yadis -- initiated by NetMesh and Six Apart/OpenID and taken up by the community around yadis.org -- which puts both LID and OpenID under the same discovery umbrella (which has the "delegation" features you are asking for).

And that the NetMesh LID implementation (both downloadable code and hosted at myLID.net) now supports OpenID and Yadis. So among other things, it does what you are asking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-07a3515c7bb9224b75674fd9f0f2ae1add25d8fc'>You seem to be missing a bit of history over the last year, assuming this is a new post.</p>
<p>For example, Yadis &#8212; initiated by NetMesh and Six Apart/OpenID and taken up by the community around yadis.org &#8212; which puts both LID and OpenID under the same discovery umbrella (which has the &#8220;delegation&#8221; features you are asking for).</p>
<p>And that the NetMesh LID implementation (both downloadable code and hosted at myLID.net) now supports OpenID and Yadis. So among other things, it does what you are asking for.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
