Grandpa Charles, King of the Franks

This weekend has been exciting for a student of genealogy.

First, I ran across an 8th cousin once removed who was able to provide records from my great-great-great-grandmother back to our shared ancestor, Sarah Boarman. Only a day later a 2nd cousin provided documentation that confirmed at least back to her granddaughter and my 5th-great-grandmother, Sarah Mudd.

This connected me to a well-researched family. But Charles Mudd’s extensive database does not confirm Sarah ‘s lineage; she’s completely missing from the family I believe her to be from.

But then, thanks to James Maloney’s tireless documentation, I found reference to Sarah in her father’s will (and James was kind enough to confirm). I am in debt to James for his public sharing of 35 years of research.

With that link confirmed, my ancestry can be documented mostly through well-kept deeds and wills through John Russell, Earl of Bedford, whose wife Alice Wyse has multiple established lineages back to Charlemagne.

While is was inevitable that I’m descended from Charlemagne, joining the ranks of those who can draw solid lines to him after only two years of research is very exciting.

From here, many databases use the popular Brøderbund World Family Tree database to go as far back as 6 A.D. to the birth of Clodius II, King of the Franks. However, tracing Charlemagne’s family further back than Pepin of Landen, born in 580, is not well documented or even widely accepted among historians. I hesitate to accept “common wisdom” in my records, because the world of ancestry research abounds with optimism. If I accepted the records of Donna and Tim, for example, I’d trace all the way to Adam.

But I’m quite pleased to have followed one line so far back as to count everyone of European descent a blood relative. This is the third line to extend beyond the 15th century from the same third-great-grandmother. I still need to work on the breadth of my pedigree; while I have detailed records of all 16 great-great-grandparents, almost half of their parents are unaccounted for and in two cases I cannot yet trace out of Missouri.

6 Comments

  1. scott allender
    Posted January 2, 2007 at 8:01 am | Permalink
    Congratulations Hans! Finding yourself to be relative to Charlemagne is quite impressive.
  2. Leo
    Posted May 31, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink
    Well, congrats, this means we must have a common ancestor, as I have found the Charles the Great [Charlemagne] in my own. What is really exiting, is that he can be traced back ot Adam, through the kings of Israel.
  3. Ron Boulter
    Posted August 14, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink
    How on earth do you manage to do all of this?Iwould be a basket case in no time .Congratulations. Ron.
  4. Posted March 30, 2008 at 8:20 pm | Permalink
    Dang, I’ve always been jealous of my older brother. I wanna be related to Charlegmagne, too!!!
  5. Posted August 10, 2008 at 11:23 pm | Permalink
    Caution: Much of the research on the Boarman family that connects WIlliam to Andrew to Andrew to William is from my research and database. I must caution you that the connection to the two Andrews is not solidified and, in fact, happens to be in question. There has been no affirmative connection of William Boarman, Sarah’s father, to the Boreman family that connects with the Roucle family and other families of such notoriety in England. While I maintain William is connected to this family, my extensive research into the Boreman family has not connected him as of yet. If you have different information, I would love to have it.
  6. Posted August 15, 2008 at 5:55 pm | Permalink
    Thanks much for the update, Charles. Indeed, the William-Andrew-Andrew-William Boarman line in my records is merely an attributed import of your GEDCOM.

    I have a few other paths to Grandpa Charles, but none I’m as confident in as this one, so I’m interested in the reliability of this connection.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*