Comments on: Terrorized by gullibility http://hans.gerwitz.com/2007/02/02/terrorized-by-gullibility.html?nucrss=1 The soliloquy of Hans Gerwitz Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:04:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Hans http://hans.gerwitz.com/2007/02/02/terrorized-by-gullibility.html#comment-1745 Hans Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:20:28 +0000 http://hans.gerwitz.com/2007/02/02/terrorized-by-gullibility.html#comment-1745 David Galbraith <a href="http://www.davidgalbraith.org/archives/001236.html" rel="nofollow">ponders the latter idea</a> as well: <q cite="http://www.davidgalbraith.org/archives/001236.html">I doubt we would censor the cross, even although it ironically represents a genuine instrument of Roman terrorism, rather than a naughty gesture.</q> David Galbraith ponders the latter idea as well: I doubt we would censor the cross, even although it ironically represents a genuine instrument of Roman terrorism, rather than a naughty gesture. ]]> By: Hans http://hans.gerwitz.com/2007/02/02/terrorized-by-gullibility.html#comment-1724 Hans Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:47:39 +0000 http://hans.gerwitz.com/2007/02/02/terrorized-by-gullibility.html#comment-1724 Now we can take part in saving Boston from this threat at http://dyewell.com/saveboston/ If this were <em>my</em> <a href="http://www.simgod.com/" rel="nofollow">SimUniverse</a>, I'd rewind and try replaying this scenario where the images used were, say, Christian crosses rather than pop culture icons. Would there be any panic at all? If there was, would the authorities handle it differently? Would a similar handling spawn more outrage or more bemusement? Now we can take part in saving Boston from this threat at http://dyewell.com/saveboston/

If this were my SimUniverse, I’d rewind and try replaying this scenario where the images used were, say, Christian crosses rather than pop culture icons. Would there be any panic at all? If there was, would the authorities handle it differently? Would a similar handling spawn more outrage or more bemusement? ]]>