Bill Gates vs. John Nash

It is argua­ble that Apple was more inno­va­tive with tech­no­logy prior to Steve Jobs’s return to power. He dis­sol­ved the ATG, home of the ori­gi­nal Cocoa, and Apple Data Detec­tors, and famously axed the New­ton, con­ti­nued deve­lop­ment of which might have given us the iPhone as a plat­form years ago.

But the Newton’s brand had been tain­ted by the poor handw­ri­ting recog­ni­tion of the first models and a clunky form factor.

New (or retur­ning) to Apple’s inno­va­tion DNA is mar­ke­ting. And I don’t mean just adver­ti­sing or PR, I mean making stra­te­gic busi­ness deci­sions to enter sen­si­ble mar­kets that capi­ta­lize but don’t dilute brands and have exploi­ta­ble niches. Any stu­dent of game theory and busi­ness can appre­ciate that this is the real genius behind the 21st century’s Apple.

Mic­ro­soft, meanwhile, has never really inno­va­ted in tech­no­logy. They have, though, bla­zed a trail in busi­ness; it could even be said that Bill Gates esta­blished the prac­tice of selling soft­ware. How disap­poin­ting that they’ve taken to trying to copy other busi­ness models with var­ying suc­cess; the Xbox, Zune, and Win­dows Mobile Smartpho­nes are all me-​​too plays. MS has plenty of bri­lliant minds wor­king on soft­ware, they need to get a few of them in stra­te­gic marketing.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Aether Child Theme by altamente decorativo & bendler.tv | built on Thematic Framework