hans.gerwitz

Pointing at the TV

Posted on August 29th, 2010

By now it’s generally agreed that iTV is coming on Wednesday and is likely to be iOS-​​based.

Many folks have assumed that “running iOS” means “running iPad apps” directly, or iPad-​​style apps via another App Store. This raises a lot of ques­tions about the inter­action model; how do you manip­ulate an app that’s beyond your reach? If we expect any new iOS device will run existing apps from smaller screens, we run into the “focus” problem: if you can’t touch directly, you have to have context for the “noun” you are about to “verb” with the next tap.

There are a few ways to address focus.

A direc­tional controller (d-​​pad or gestural touch surface) can navigate a straight­forward, recti­linear menu interface as most TV inter­faces (including Apple TV) do today. Or that same controller could move focus between more arbi­trary active regions, as with many DVD menus. Jon Bell and Dan Wineman are excited about gestural touch surfaces and their potential here. After all, the Remote app for controlling your Apple TV from an iPhone has a similar touch surface approach for navi­gating menus.

I’m not convinced. Even though it is common to confound gestural touch surfaces and direct touch UI, this is still an indirect focus controller. I cannot imagine Apple adopting a discretely-​​shifting-​​focus UI akin to DVD menus, and the best alter­native seems to be intro­ducing a cursor for arbi­trary focus. Once you’re using a direc­tional controller (gestural or not) to control a cursor on a screen (decoupled from the controller surface)… well, that’s a pointer. You might as well have a mouse.

The indirect nature of pointers is contrary to the “magic” of direct inter­action Steve Jobs is excited about.

A more widget-​​like App Store isn’t out of the question, though, for very simple apps with simple inter­ac­tions. My hopes, though, are for greater inter­action between iOS devices.

It’s a common complaint that we cannot stream audio from our iPads to AirTunes; we could see that enabled along with a video streaming API. I imagine content owners are the only obstacle to the SDK enabling the Netflix app to send video to your AppleTV. Such an interface could mature into a very compelling platform for passive display, whether for displaying Keynote presen­ta­tions or dash­boards for multi­player games.

Coordination from other direction would also be sensible. If any connected iOS “remote” could display inter­active meta-​​content, we’d finally have a chance at the sorts of compelling cross-​​screen expe­ri­ences I’ve seen mocked up to many times. Apple already has a format for that, which could let us browse through supple­mental content on our personal screen while watching media on the big one.

With time, I imagine we’ll see this sort of coor­di­nation, even if it’s disabled for “profes­sional” content. This week, maybe we just get a scroll wheel.

Tags: ,
Filed under: design | View Comments

Bill Gates vs. John Nash

Posted on February 20th, 2007

It is arguable that Apple was more inno­v­ative with tech­nology prior to Steve Jobs’s return to power. He dissolved the ATG, home of the original Cocoa, and Apple Data Detectors, and famously axed the Newton, continued devel­opment of which might have given us the iPhone as a platform years ago.

But the Newton’s brand had been tainted by the poor hand­writing recog­nition of the first models and a clunky form factor.

New (or returning) to Apple’s inno­vation DNA is marketing. And I don’t mean just adver­tising or PR, I mean making strategic business deci­sions to enter sensible markets that capi­talize but don’t dilute brands and have exploitable niches. Any student of game theory and business can appre­ciate that this is the real genius behind the 21st century’s Apple.

Microsoft, mean­while, has never really inno­vated in tech­nology. They have, though, blazed a trail in business; it could even be said that Bill Gates estab­lished the practice of selling software. How disap­pointing that they’ve taken to trying to copy other business models with varying success; the Xbox, Zune, and Windows Mobile Smartphones are all me-​​too plays. MS has plenty of bril­liant minds working on software, they need to get a few of them in strategic marketing.

Tags: , , ,
Filed under: business, marketing | View Comments

A more realistic desktop metaphor

Posted on February 8th, 2007

The recent attention to Apple’s patents on “piles” reminds me of an enter­taining conver­sation Ryan and I had in 2005.

We were caught up in the HDR fad, and lamented how poor iPhoto is at managing photos meant to be grouped, as when auto-​​bracketing exposure or shooting for panorama stitching. As I said aloud that the problem seems to be there’s a need for grouping items at a “less than album” manner, I recalled the original piles patent and lamented that they hadn’t moved forward on that, and here’s a perfect oppor­tunity for them to actually innovate in user interface. I believe I went on to complain that if Tognazzini were still there they would’ve solved this problem already.

What makes this conver­sation memo­rable is the punchline: later that week I decided to look into Aperture and discovered that it has stacks. Exactly the feature we longed for. And it’d been there for a few months already.

Tags: , , , , ,
Filed under: memories | View Comments

iPhone dreams

Posted on February 7th, 2007

I know it doesn’t matter, but I have so many things I wish my next phone/​PDA could do, I’m going to list them for my own amusement. Even though most of them won’t happen very soon, at least while the iPhone remains closed to native third-​​party applications.

I could manage data with specialized tools. Special-​​purpose editors for blogs like this, wikis for knowledge management at work, and genealogy records could take advantage of the multi­touch UI.

Assuming it lacks aGPS, I could detect location by network to orient Google Maps and geocode photos.

[I happen to believe we’ll see aGPS or PSAP in a very early release, based on Jobs’s unusual and irra­tional enthu­siasm about the satellite view in Google Maps.]

I could clean up and manip­ulate photos before sharing them online.

I could control my jukebox iMac from the couch without inter­rupting what’s currently playing to use Front Row. And control the rest of the home theater, lighting, etc.

I could update Last.fm on the fly.

I could play not just touch­screen microgames but serious games and puzzles.

Maybe I under­es­timate what will be possible with Safari alone, espe­cially if it includes Flash. It’s already amazing how many of my “desktop” tools actually run in Safari or largely render via WebKit. If the iPhone is half as successful as it’s poised to be, it will quickly vault Safari to the ranks of browsers you cannot afford to ignore. I’d be surprised if Microsoft isn’t already talking to Apple about WPF/​E.

Tags: , , , , ,
Filed under: work | View Comments

Daily Bookmarks

Posted on January 26th, 2007

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Filed under: links | View Comments