hans.gerwitz

iToldYouSo

Posted on September 13th, 2006

Apple has pre-​​announced their TV-​​integration product, tenta­tively named iTV.

This is exactly what I’ve predicted the long-​​rumored “Asteroid” product to be. Since Apple embraced video on the iPod it’s been a simple conclusion that Airport Express and Front Row would end up in a targeted device. Lately I wondered if they were going to simply produce a Mac Mini HD, but I’m glad to see they under­stand that living room media presen­tation is a very specialized (yet common) need.

An important part of this announcement seems to be over­looked: this is not a Mac OS X computer. Unlike Microsoft, Apple is not a software company and is more than happy to build a future of personal media management based on a collection of specialized devices. AAPL share­holders should rejoice that the calls for a split between the hardware and software divi­sions of Apple were ignored, and that the company clearly under­stands that they need to be more than a PC manufacturer.

Tags:
Filed under: uncategorized | View Comments

Good UI sighting

Posted on May 22nd, 2006

Technorati has a wonderful solution for shielding users from acci­dental destructive action: offer an undo link along with the response message:
technorati_undo.gif
This is much less disruptive than an “are you sure?” dialog, which are often ignored by confir­mation fatigued users. It may seem too subtle, but designers are already tasked with taste­fully drawing attention to response messages, and a user that’s just made a mistake will be willing to invest a few seconds of attention.

Tags: ,
Filed under: geek, uncategorized | View Comments

OpenID has it right

Posted on April 6th, 2006

There has been much ado over the last year about identity. Most of the early plays were centralized thinly-​​veiled attempts to own your identity. Even many of the 2.0 systems depend on the solvency of a managing orga­ni­zation. SAML is a big heavy beast as you might expect from a committee.

So, I was very excited in January of 2005 to see LID. I set out to make my site compliant. I started by writing a server, as I needed a LID URL for testing. It quickly became apparent, though, that reusing an already-​​dynamic URL would require I modify existing request-​​handling code. At that time, I was using SnipSnap and the project was dormant and not very exten­sible, so sharing my work would require forking the codebase.

It is ridiculous, I concluded, that I should even have such a dilemma, why can’t I just reference the LID server URL from my published, friendly one? So I queried Johannes Ernst:

I find it a bit unwieldy to have the LID server acting as a filter for a URL otherwise served by other appli­ca­tions. I would like to under­stand why the spec doesn’t either postfix the URL (e.g. “http://www.example.com/~me/lid/”) or always begin the querys­tring with a para­meter that can be used for filtering (e.g. ?lid&help=help”). (I don’t want to simply use http://phobia.com/lid/, as I think the re-​​use of web URLs is an appealing attribute of LID.)

He responded by pointing me to a ratio­nal­ization of using your “real” URL which didn’t really answer my question, ignored my acknowl­edgement of same, and made it clear he just didn’t see why I might be annoyed that his spec basi­cally asserts “we hereby claim a set of querys­tring para­meters in the name of NetMesh!”

So, I just lost interest and decided to give the market more time to find a solution. A year later, and along comes OpenID, which has this to say about LID:

Assumes that identity URLs are dynamic docu­ments that can handle fancy URL para­meters. Not true in real life, which is key for adoption.

Amen, brother. The tremendous interest a decoupled approach has garnered has even convinced Johannes that even OpenID isn’t abstract enough, and we really need more redi­rection so everyone can still have their favorite spec. Whatever. I’ll be looking to comply with OpenID soon.

Tags:
Filed under: uncategorized | View Comments

Push, schmush

Posted on March 31st, 2006

It seems a foregone conclusion that RSS marketing is poised to take off. I remain a bit skep­tical about the uptake rate of Joe User to a brand new “not browsing, not email” medium.

Nonetheless, I believe it’s inevitable. Some fun approaches are surfacing, but perhaps more important are the more mundane appli­ca­tions that will introduce feeds to new audiences.

So, as the current email-​​dominated marketing industry gives up trying to elbow spammers aside and embraces “pull” marketing, FeedBurner is uniquely posi­tioned to grow by leaps and bounds. They only need to recognize the value they can provide to marketers-​​as-​​publishers rather than by selling space within other publishers’ feeds before the email push vendors get there and add feed management to their portfolios.

Tags:
Filed under: uncategorized | View Comments

Billiken hauntings

Posted on March 27th, 2006

I’ve spent most of my academic life surrounded by Billikens, at University and high school. It’s easy to consider the fellow a Saint Louis phenomenon, but then he pops up in under­ground Seattle.

Researching a new digital camera, I was quite surprised to find him (even labeled) the center­piece of a demon­stration picture in Japan. Wikipedia is kind enough to explain: natu­rally Billiken is enshrined throughout Japan. Of course, the best summary of Billiken’s life is found at a toy museum in Arkansas.

Sometimes the whole planet seems too small.

Tags:
Filed under: uncategorized | View Comments